U.S. steps up social media screening of immigration applicants

During the week of October 16, 2025, USCIS Director Joseph Edlow stated that the agency is reviewing the social media of people applying for immigration benefits to detect “anti-American views” and activity considered “beyond the pale.” Although USCIS says this review is not the only factor for approving or denying applications, the announcement marks a significant shift in how legal applicants are evaluated.

You can also read: “What you need to know this week in immigration”

What did USCIS say?

• Edlow indicated that the agency examines social media posts, public interactions, and the applicant’s associations in order to assess whether there is support for extremist ideologies or activities that could be deemed “anti-American.”
• “People are free to do what they want on social media or anywhere else. And if someone doesn’t support the same candidate as me… that’s not what we’re talking about,” Edlow said.
• He explained that what they could consider is “people who are actively supporting the violent overthrow of this country, or providing material support to terrorist organizations.”
• He noted that these factors do not replace traditional eligibility criteria, but “it is a factor we want to fully understand.”

Context and background

In August 2025, a directive was issued instructing USCIS to consider it an “overwhelmingly negative factor” for granting immigration benefits if an applicant holds “anti-American views.” In recent years, the agency has increased its focus on immigration fraud, expanded questions about “good moral character,” and reactivated the practice of “neighborhood checks” (investigations of neighbors and coworkers) during citizenship applications. Immigrant rights advocates have warned that these practices could violate freedom of speech and create a chilling effect even for those who are legally present.

Why does it matter?

• Assessment of public profile risks: many applicants do not consider how their posts or associations may be reviewed by USCIS.
• Preparation for possible RFEs or interviews: USCIS may request explanations about posts or associations.
• Clear communication: explaining that although freedom of speech exists, some factors may be interpreted negatively.
• Monitoring case law: staying alert to how courts define the limits between security reviews and violation of rights.

In conclusion, Edlow’s statement shows that the evaluation of immigration applicants is no longer limited only to forms and records. Digital profiles, social media, and public associations are being considered by USCIS.

From: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/immigration-social-media-anti-american-uscis-joseph-edlow/

For more information on these topics, visit Paralegal Clases’ social media pages and join our live sessions every Wednesday.

Instagram:   @Paralegalclases
Facebook:   Instituto Paralegal de las Américas
Youtube:   Instituto Paralegal
Tiktok:   @Paralegalnews