Biden’s “Mobile Wall”: Amid Environmental Criticism and Border Security Demands
The Biden administration’s plan to build a “mobile wall” along the southern border of Texas has sparked controversy among both environmentalists and advocates for stricter border surveillance. This approach, designed to address illegal crossings, has faced criticism on various fronts.
Mobile Design and Environmental Criticisms
The project, covering approximately 20 miles in Starr County, was announced in September and has drawn discontent from environmentalists since then. The waiver of the application of 26 federal environmental protection laws in October to expedite construction has raised further concerns about its impact on local wildlife and habitat.
Rodney Scott, former chief of the U.S. Border Patrol, has expressed disagreement, stating that the construction goes against the will of the Border Patrol and arguing that the proposed barriers may not be strong enough to stop illegal crossings.
Debate on Border Security
Despite President Biden’s campaign promise not to build more walls, construction is progressing. The increasing arrival of migrants at the southern border has prompted the need for additional measures, according to the administration. However, the effectiveness of the “mobile wall” is questioned by those advocating for stronger border security.
The rise in illegal crossings, surpassing 2 million for the second consecutive year, has intensified the urgency to find effective solutions.
Environmental criticisms focus on the waiver of environmental protection and species laws during the construction process. The construction of barriers in the past, including Trump’s wall, has negatively affected wildlife, and environmentalists fear that the “mobile” design could cause even more damage to animal habitats.
Biden has justified the decision by citing the need to use funds from the Trump era and comply with the law requiring the completion of construction by 2023. Meanwhile, activists, including the Center for Biological Diversity, have sent letters to the government requesting a reconsideration of environmental protection laws, receiving no response so far.
The discussion on Biden’s “mobile wall” will continue as construction progresses, and voices for and against express concerns about its environmental impact and effectiveness in border security.
If you want to learn more about these issues, visit the social media accounts of Paralegal Clases and join our live sessions every Wednesday at 5:00 P.M.
Instagram: @Paralegalclases
Facebook: Paralegal Institute of the Americas
Youtube: Paralegal Institute
TikTok: @Paralegalnews
Source for this blog: UNIVISION
