Judicial order requires body-worn cameras for federal immigration agents in Chicago

On October 17, 2025, a Chicago district judge imposed a new measure requiring federal immigration agents to use body-worn cameras during immigration enforcement activities, including interactions with the public. The order responds to concerns about previous noncompliance with a court directive related to the use of riot control force and visible identification during immigration operations.

You can also read: “New fees for asylum applications and work permits: what you need to know“

What does the order stipulate?

Judge Sara Ellis ruled that:
• Federal agents involved in immigration activities must be trained and equipped with body-worn cameras.
• These cameras must be activated when conducting immigration enforcement actions, especially during interactions with the public.
• Representatives of the federal agencies must appear before the court to explain how the order is being implemented, which remains in effect until November 6.
• The measure expands a previous order that prohibited the use of tear gas or rubber bullets against journalists, protesters, and clergy without prior warning or visible identification.

Context and background

The order is framed within the deportation campaign “Operation Midway Blitz” in Chicago, which sparked mass detentions and protests. Judge Ellis noted incidents where federal agents deployed tear gas without warning or acted without proper identification. A lawsuit filed by journalists, protesters, and clergy alleges that the agents acted in retaliation and seeks measures to prevent the use of riot control weapons without warning or a clear threat.

Why does this decision matter?

For those working in immigration law, this measure implies several consequences:

• Greater transparency and accountability through recordings of immigration operations.
• Reinforcement of protocol compliance and judicial oversight.
• A new tool for defense or litigation in cases of excessive use of force or rights violations.
• A possible precedent to require body cameras in other jurisdictions.
• Greater ability to verify compliance with protocol.

In conclusion, Judge Sara Ellis’s order marks progress in the oversight of immigration operations and the protection of civil rights. Although temporary, it could influence the broader adoption of body-worn cameras as a transparency standard. Knowing these measures is key to anticipating risks and strengthening legal representation.

From: Reuters – ‘Judge orders federal immigration agents to use body cameras in Chicago’ (17 de octubre de 2025)

For more information on these topics, visit Paralegal Clases’ social media pages and join our live sessions every Wednesday.

Instagram:   @Paralegalclases
Facebook:   Instituto Paralegal de las Américas
Youtube:   Instituto Paralegal
Tiktok:   @Paralegalnews